PhiLho tech web log - Comments

Philippe Lhoste: Sorting strings by respecting natural order for numbers

nospam@example.com (Philippe Lhoste) — Tue, 09 Oct 2012 21:19:42 +0200

Doh! I started with XOR, then came up with this complicated test, probably because for some reason, I have a mental block with using (in)equality on booleans... But taking one step away, it looks perfectly logic! Thanks for pointing that out, I updated the repository.

David: Sorting strings by respecting natural order for numbers

nospam@example.com (David) — Mon, 08 Oct 2012 17:26:49 +0200

Just a tiny remark: (b1 && !b2 || !b1 && b2) is the same as (b1 != b2) I had the same problem to solve at work, but I used some Integer.parseInt(), so probably slower...

Aude: Gimp 2.6: Copy transparency from one layer/image to another

nospam@example.com (Aude) — Sat, 08 Oct 2011 23:22:19 +0200

This is the tip I use to make glossy buttons. Very useful though! Aude

Rondinet: Les accents sont capitaux

nospam@example.com (Rondinet) — Fri, 05 Aug 2011 10:21:46 +0200

Télérama a aussi fait des siennes en décidant d'abandonner (subitement, d'un numéro à l'autre) la capitalisation originale des titres d'oeuvres étrangères !!! Les films anglophones sans majuscules me deviennent difficiles à lire, sans vouloir non plus être pédant... L'allemand s'en sort bien. Donc prenons l'habitude de sursauter en lisant notre journal : "lun Caméscope", "votre Caddie(R)", "Beijing"... --Jidé

Philippe Lhoste: Premier billet !

nospam@example.com (Philippe Lhoste) — Tue, 28 Jun 2011 23:58:31 +0200

Beware, "script kiddie" has a somehow negative meaning, of people just getting some random script to try and attack sites or users... That's said, that's thanks like this one that keep me going, I am always glad to learn that my code has been useful to somebody. Even if I code very little AutoHotley nowadays.

Floris: Premier billet !

nospam@example.com (Floris) — Sun, 26 Jun 2011 11:06:17 +0200

Dear PhilLho, Being a script kiddie I used a lot of your code in my little projects using autohotkey. Many, many thanks for your work. People like yourself is what makes this world worth being on. It fills me with great joy to read your explanations and scripts of ingenuity. As many others around the world you are what is driving our future generations ability to be creative and share their ideas with others. Hoping to share my code soon of one of my new projects that incorporates some of your code. Thanks, An admirer

clémence: Nom de nationalité : majuscule ou pas ?

nospam@example.com (clémence) — Mon, 28 Feb 2011 00:00:36 +0100

je ne sais pas, pour répondre à la question, mais j'espere que (selon e theme de la discussion) il s'agissait bien du mot "égYptiennes" cordialement, clémence

lionel: Mode d'emploi

nospam@example.com (lionel) — Wed, 08 Dec 2010 00:56:11 +0100

Philippe Lhoste: Mode d'emploi

nospam@example.com (Philippe Lhoste) — Thu, 02 Dec 2010 21:21:23 +0100

Oups ! Merci de la remarque (et de ta persistance — je m'étonnais aussi de cette question...). Encore heureux que je reconnais dans cet article faire des fautes moi-même... Je parle de relire à chaud, ici ce serait à très froid (4 ans après...).

lionel: Mode d'emploi

nospam@example.com (lionel) — Thu, 02 Dec 2010 11:26:20 +0100

Merci, mais ma remarque était faite pour toi : "... l'arrogant regardant de haut les « pauvre illettrés » ...".

Philippe Lhoste: Mode d'emploi

nospam@example.com (Philippe Lhoste) — Fri, 26 Nov 2010 06:50:56 +0100

On écrit « pauvres illettrés » dans tous les cas (pauvre peut ici être un nom ou un adjectif), l'accord se fait toujours.

lionel: Mode d'emploi

nospam@example.com (lionel) — Fri, 26 Nov 2010 00:06:19 +0100

d'ailleurs écrit-on les « pauvre illettrés » ou les « pauvres illettrés » ?

Philippe Lhoste: Beware of JavaFX's type inference!

nospam@example.com (Philippe Lhoste) — Thu, 04 Mar 2010 23:14:27 +0100

OK, thanks for the clarification, although the conclusion is the same...

HelperMethod: Beware of JavaFX's type inference!

nospam@example.com (HelperMethod) — Thu, 04 Mar 2010 21:08:48 +0100

Well, break; actually IS an expression. Everything in JavaFX is an expression. break; just has return type Void. So nothing wrong here. The compiler was just confused because in some branch the function returned Void and in another some Value Type.

Kishore: Premier billet !

nospam@example.com (Kishore) — Wed, 03 Feb 2010 08:58:32 +0100

Hi Philippe, I uploaded the netbeans source to my blog. www.gyanlabs.com/blog regards, Kishore